![]() Some transcriptions try to reflect the interview exactly, with breaks, overlaps, and all. You will need to determine, and note, how your transcription reflects the interview. Should you transcribe exactly what was said or a version that might be easier to read or understand? Which is more important, content or spoken form? Meaning or style? Broken sentences or intent? How should emotion appear in the written text? To what extent should characteristics of performance be included? Can we truly capture any of these things? Willow Roberts Powers, Transcription Techniques for the Spoken Word, 9) Speaking and writing are different, and turning the spoken word into writing requires careful thought. Transcribing is not as straightforward as it might seem. The Verbatim Transcript? Or Acknowledged Edits? This may also encourage you to avoid “uh-huh” and other interruptions during an interview. Donald Ritchie recommends every interviewer does at least one transcription to understand the importance of a good quality recording. If you have good transcription software and a foot pedal, it will still take 3-6 minutes of transcription for audio, so you can anticipate 3 to six hours for an hour of audio. If you do plan to do the transcription yourself, you’ll need to budget your time. This is something to plan for in your budget if you don’t plan doing the transcription yourself. The last quote I got for a transcription (2019) was $8 a transcribed page which is about $120 for an hour interview. Then it will have to be edited, corrected, and final editing. You can expect to expend an average of six to twelve typing hours for each hour of recording. –Willow Roberts Powers, Transcription Techniques for the Spoken Word, 10. For those of us with an interest in human beings and language, the work of transcribing broadens our experience of speech, gives the analytical mind much more to play with than the text itself ever well, and strengthens our memory for the work that lies ahead….We talk a great deal the opportunity to do nothing but listen is a rare treat. Many people think it is also mechanical, neither challenging nor interesting. ![]() Transcribing is hard, time-consuming work. It’s generally expected by the scholarly community.You have something to show for your efforts.Words that are hard to hear can be checked by the actual speaker questions that were inadequately answered can be expanded by written comments. A corrected transcript may be more accurate and complete because the recorded works were put down in writing while the narrator was still available to clear up obscurities.There is value to listening to a transcript, but researchers overwhelmingly prefer a transcript for ease and speed of use. ![]() The transcribed interview is much easier for researchers to use than an audio tape.–Willow Roberts Powers, Transcription Techniques for the Spoken Word, 2. The reason for transcripts-are to record, to illuminate, to re-present, and to facilitate analysis. Adapted from the Utah State Historical Society “How to Conduct an Oral History” Booklet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |